MLK and Malcolm X Comparison - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 887 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/03/26 Category History Essay Level High school Topics: Malcolm X Essay Martin Luther King Essay Did you like this example? Both Martin luther king and Malcolm X were two prominent civil rights leaders in the fight for the betterment of black peoples lives although they are both agreed on achieving civil rights for the black community and agreed that the treatment of black people by white people was unjust their philosophy and how to achieve justice was different. Martin luther king and Malcolm X had very different views on the interaction of black and white people. Martin Luther preached for black people to have the same rights and freedoms as white people and coexist with whites and was even open to having white people join in on the protest for equality. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "MLK and Malcolm X Comparison" essay for you Create order Must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers , as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone. (MLK, p3) Where was Malcolm X believed in Black nationalism and was and was really negative towards white people and politicians. Even Though you can vote they fix it so youre voting for nobody. Because either dog you chose I guarantee you youll still be in the dog house. (Malcolm X, p8) By the dog, he means the political parties, no matter who the black community votes fore they all are against them. The dixiecrats in the south being obviously against them, and the democrats in the north pretending to be for them. The negro revolt is controlled by the white man. and all of the demonstrations to desegregate are just artificial fires that have been ignited and fanned by the white liberals in desperate hope that they can use this artificial revolution to fight off the real black revolution (Malcolm X , p17). There are efforts to desegregate public places, have white people realize that black people are no different from them and they should have the same rights. And Malcolm is just calling it trick to get black people to vote. And that also raises the point that he seems to be against black and whites integrating into society as one people. Martin Luther king and Malcolm x had divergent views about how the the to best achieve black rights. King believed that non violence is the answer. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force (MLK, p2) Because you can only achieve peace with peace, and violence breeds violence. Non violence is effective because there is nothing the other side can do, they are not breaking any laws that could them trowen in jail, they are just peacefully protesting tring the to get the word out about racial inequality and at the same time showing that they are just peaceful and respectful people that belong in the soci ety. Malcolm on the other hand believes in violence brought down by god. Revolutions are never peaceful, never loving, never nonviolent. Nor are they ever compromising. Revolutions are destructive and bloody. (Malcolm X, p 17). He claims that god controls the black revolution to violently get rid of the power of the white oppressors. They both of these civil rights leaders agree on strengthening the black economy Malcolm X states: The economic philosophy of Black Nationalism only means that we should own and operate and control the economy of our community.(p2). He blames black people for their poverty and terrible housing, by supporting the white mans economy rather than the back economy, he advocates that blacks setup storers and business and blacks to shop at those businesses. So that the money stays in the black community, rather than in the white comuti and making the white man richer. Businesses set up by the black community would also give black people jobs. King preaches: we just need to go around to these stores, and to these massive industries in our country, and say, weve come by here to ask you to make the first item on your agenda fair treatment, Now, if you are not prepared to do that, we [must withdraw] economic support from you. (p8). If these companies dont follow the wishes of the blacks for fair treatment they are hurting themselves by losing customers and therefore profit. And black are going to spend their money black businesses instead. Both of them also base their beliefs on religion. Martin Luther who is a christian preaches but god has commanded us to be concerned about the slums down here, and his children who cant eat three square meals a day (p8) I just want to do gods will (p11). Martin Luther king and Malcolm X brought fought for civil rights for the black community. Some of their ideas were similar such the idea of building strong black economy and both of their beliefs came from religion. How ever they also disagreed on other ideas such as Martin luthers idea of unity of white and black community and non violence vs. Malcolm Xs black nationalism and violent approach. Yet in the end together they achieved the a monumental and glorious agenda of civil rights for blacks. And therefore deserve recognit ion of going down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation (MLK,p2)

Catharine Beecher Biography

Catharine Beecher was an American author and educator, born into a family of religious activists. She spent her life working to further the education of women, believing that educated and moral women were the foundation of family life in society. Catharine Beecher Fast Facts Born: September 6, 1800 in East Hampton, New YorkDied: May 12, 1878 in Elmira, New YorkParents: Lyman Beecher and Roxana FooteSiblings: Harriet Beecher Stowe and Henry Ward BeecherKnown For: American activist who believed that educated and moral women were the foundation of an upright society. She worked to further educational opportunities for women in the nineteenth century but opposed womens suffrage. Early Life Catharine Beecher was the eldest of 13 children born to Lyman Beecher and his wife, Roxana Foote. Lyman was a Presbyterian minister and outspoken activist, and was the founder of the American Temperance Society. Catharines siblings included Harriet, who would grow up to be an abolitionist and write Uncle Toms Cabin, and Henry Ward, who became a clergyman whose activism included social reforms and the abolitionist movement. Like many young ladies at the time, Catharine, who was born in 1800, spent the first ten years of her life being educated at home. Later, her parents sent her to private school in Connecticut, but she was dissatisfied with the curriculum. Subjects like mathematics, philosophy, and Latin were not available in girls schools, so Catharine learned these on her own. After her mother died in 1816, Catharine returned home and took over the running of her fathers household and supervision of her younger siblings; a few years later she began working as a teacher. By the time she was 23, she and her sister Mary had opened the Hartford Female Seminary to provide educational opportunities for girls. Corbis via Getty Images / Getty Images Activism Catharine believed that it was important for women to be well-educated, so she taught herself all sorts of subjects that she could then pass along to her students. She learned Latin from her brother Edward, the headmaster of another school in Hartford, and studied chemistry, algebra, and rhetoric. She presented the novel idea that young women could learn all of these subjects from a single teacher, and soon her school was in high demand. She also believed that ladies benefited from physical activity, which was a revolutionary concept. Catharine disdained the poor health that was brought on by tight corsets and poor diets, so she developed a calisthenics plan for her students. She soon began writing about her curriculum, to serve as a guide for other teachers. Catharine felt the primary goal of education should be to provide a basis for the development of the student’s conscience and moral makeup. Catharine Beecher. Black Batchelder  / Schlesinger Library / Public Domain As her students grew up and moved on, Catharine shifted her focus to the roles that they would eventually play in society. Although she strongly believed that child-rearing and running the domestic aspects of a home were a source of pride for women, she also felt that women were entitled to respect and responsibility outside of their roles as wives and mothers. In the 1830s she followed her father, Lyman, to Cincinnati, and opened the Western Female Institute. Her goal was to educate women so they could become teachers, which had traditionally been a male-dominated profession. Catharine, who never married, saw women as natural teachers, with education as an extension of their roles as the guides of domestic home life. Because more men were leaving the world of education to go into industry, training women as teachers was a perfect solution. After a few years, she closed the school due to a lack of public support. The Beechers were not popular in Cincinnati because of their radical abolitionist views, and in 1837 Catharine wrote and published Slavery and Abolition with Reference to the Duty of American Females. In this treatise, she argued that women needed to stay out of the abolition movement because of the potential for violence, and instead needed to focus on creating moral and harmonious home lives for their husbands and children. This, she believed, would give women power and influence. Her work A Treatise on Domestic Economy for the Use of Young Ladies at Home and at School, published in 1841, promoted the responsibility of girls schools to teach not only intellectual pursuits, but also physical activity and moral guidance. The work became a best-seller, offering helpful suggestions on how to manage domestic life. Women needed a solid educational foundation to manage their homes, she felt, using this as the foundation from which they could change society. Front page of Miss Beechers Housekeeper and Healthkeeper. Public Domain / Wikimedia Commons Although Catharine felt women needed to be educated, she also believed they should stay out of politics, and was opposed to women earning the right to vote. Legacy Over her lifetime, Catharine opened numerous schools for women, wrote dozens of essays and pamphlets for causes in which she believed, and lectured around the country. Through this work, she helped gain respect for the role of women in society, and encouraged women to find employment as teachers. This helped to change the way society looked at education and careers for women. Catherine died on May 12, 1878, while visiting her brother Thomas. After her death, three different teaching universities named buildings in her honor, including one in Cincinnati. Sources Beecher, Catharine E, and Harriet Beecher Stowe. â€Å"The Project Gutenberg EBook, A Treatise on Domestic Economy, by Catherine Esther Beecher.†A Treatise on Domestic Economy, by Catherine Esther Beecher, Project Gutenberg, www.gutenberg.org/files/21829/21829-h/21829-h.htm.â€Å"Catherine Beecher.†Ã‚  History of American Women, 2 Apr. 2017, www.womenhistoryblog.com/2013/10/catherine-beecher.html.Cruea, Susan M., Changing Ideals of Womanhood During the Nineteenth-Century Woman Movement (2005). General Studies Writing Faculty Publications. 1. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/gsw_pub/1Turpin, Andrea L. â€Å"The Ideological Origins of the Womens College: Religion, Class, and Curriculum in the Educational Visions of Catharine Beecher and Mary Lyon.†Ã‚  History of Education Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, 2010, pp. 133–158., doi:10.1111/j.1748-5959.2010.00257.x.

UMUC EDCP Assignment 4 - 1416 Words

A Vision for the Communities: Becoming an Urban Planner University of Maryland, University College EDCP 100 October 13, 2013 As children we were asked what we wanted to be when we grew up. I remember giving the rather un-realistic answer of superstar at the time. I struggled with finding a path that suited me for awhile; however now that I am older and have a better understanding of the world, I have the answer to what I want to be, and that is an urban planner. According to the American Planning Association (American Planning Association, 2013), Planning, also called urban planning or city and regional planning, is a dynamic profession that works to improve the welfare of people and their†¦show more content†¦I will have the time throughout my undergraduate career to cultivate this skill, so that I too will be a successful planner. I have also learned the components of setting a goal, which is that it has to be attainable and has to have measurable actions. I have decided to volunteer or have an internship every summer until I graduate. This is something reasonable since there are many opportuni ties in my community to volunteer, and measurable because I will be able to add the experience to my resume after each experience. Finally, I have set a foundation for time-management, critical thinking and proper communication, skills that will prove priceless to me in my profession and have just learned a lot about how I think and learn. Learning Principles has armed me with the tools that I will need for life while in school, and later once I am into my career. One thing I have had concerns about is whether I am taking the right major for what I want to be. I have always been interested in people and what they do and think, and choosing social science just felt right to me. However, I have have seen very few undergraduate urban planning programs, and I like that the University of Maryland, University College fits in with my working-adult lifestyle, even though they do not offer a specific major for urban planning. The Princeton Review explains how Urban Planning majors study

Business Law for Guns and Ammunition Company - myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theBusiness Law for Guns and Ammunition Company. Answer: Legal area The case study is related to the provisions of Restraint of trade clause or restrictive covenants. Issue In the given situation it has to be analyzed that whether the restrictive covenant which has been imposed on Clare by Maddie can be enforced by law or not Rule Although restrictive covenant are used commonly they cannot be presumably be enforceable and valid in law unless they are reasonable and have been incorporated to trigger legitimate interest of the business. The concept had been ruled by the case of Nordenfeldt v Maxim Nordenfeldt Guns and Ammunition Company [1894] AC 535. The burden of proof lies on the parties which seeks to implement the restrictive covenant to show that the clause dose not seek to provide more restraint that what is possibly required to protect the legitimate interest of the business as provided by the case of Lindner v Murdocks Garage (1950) 83 CLR 628. In the case of Stenhouse Australia v Phillips [1974] AC 391 it had been ruled that an employer cannot incorporate a clause just to prevent the other from giving competition to the business. The legitimate interest of the business which the courts would be satisfied towards making a restrictive covenant includes the trade secrets and confidential information of the employer, clients and customer of the employer and the staff of the employer. In the case of Smith v Nomad Modular Building Pty Ltd [2007] WASCA 169 it had been ruled by the court that a restraint clause can be implemented for a period of six moths and in the case of Seven Network (Operations) Limited v Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386 for a period of eight months. This signifies that the period of implementation must be reasonable and legitimate. Application In the given situation an agreement has to be entered upon by Maddie with Clare who has sold her hair dressing saloon business to Maddiie. One of the clauses of the agreement provides that she must not carry on any business in Adelaide for a period of 10 years. In order to analyze whether the clause is reasonable or not the above discussed rules have to be applied. Firstly the business which have been started by Clare is a cafe and has no connection with the hear dressing business. There is no possibility of any threat which can be said to exits in relation to the Hair dressing business which is owned by Maddie. It has been provided that few of the saloon customers are also going to the caf stared by Clare. However such an situation is causing no harm to Maddie as both the business operations are totally different. Thus as per the above discussed rules the restrictive covenant would not be legally enforceable as it is not for a reasonable cause. In addition the clause has been imposed for a period of 10 years. The various cases which have been discussed in relation to restrictive covenants signify that they can at maximum be for a period of 12 months. Thus the period of the clause is also unreasonable. Conclusion The clause imposed by Maddie on Clare is unenforceable References Nordenfeldt v Maxim Nordenfeldt Guns and Ammunition Company [1894] AC 535. Seven Network (Operations) Limited v Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386 Smith v Nomad Modular Building Pty Ltd [2007] WASCA 169 Stenhouse Australia v Phillips [1974] AC 391